let you choose the more interesting finding from the talks on the back
K °:
Tests, Changes, tests, pages =
Doing
page Link ABCD AB AC AD BC CD check what is happening, as it crawls google what are the effects of the results. Link wewetrznie of anachorami and check how responsive Google. Draw conclusions and further bet you wzjamnie Changes related according to the scheme who is the best, you call this sitemapy.
You test everything that is possible, do not say that once you have put the 10,000 pages of valuable, ask yourself the 10 catalogs, attitudes of the 20 portals.
The secret facilities: tests = effects
What tests?
All they've come to mind. How
take your time and how hard you worked you will have such facilities.
contributions:
good infrastructure should not only be addressed but also paying for themselves + to be more facilities and to position the OWNER (read: earn extra)
Brad:
Let me quote his words "on the power side affects PageRank , number of pages, and domain age. Concrete strength is calculated by dividing the link capacity by the number of outbound links, "and here my other quote," PageRank is an indicator of 'value' for the Google search page, it depends on the number and quality of BackLinks.
good example of a strong hand with a high PR is wikipedia, so many passwords in google TOP10.
[...]
not count the number of only quality, well-Linked, High PR, a lot of little postron and outbound links. Bearing 100 good sites of you can keep a lot of difficult phrases .
And it is getting so [well at least I am doing] ...
30% back in August attaches the systems.
50% of the base exchange links with sites thematic, preferably such that are high in Google fraze positioned by us, it is proposed to do it using the system on my feet [but in the near future because I still did not start].
20% of the facilities are assuming that the sites with high PR and a large number of pages you can position each phrase, no matter the topic.
Catalogs - is also a form of "common" back, IMO, better to add the page to create the directory than worthless without a good oblinkowania Meeting. [...] Generally
PR is so far the sole and authentic source of information for assessing the number and value of BL, which by the by. Google. IMO a better source of information under the PR than the number of BL, especially when BL more and more from catalogs.
Beerbant:
interjects just one little thing, the most important in my opinion ....
time and timing. Robust
Meeting (if anyone is thinking seriously) is built up one year min.
Certain phrases should be ranked as two years.
time and patience are the basic two things that must be taken into account.
